February 16, 2005

My prediction? Well, pain, obviously.

We are so going to lose tomorrow.

(For those of you who don't remember, I'm talking about how our movie is going to lose campusmoviefest.)

There are two major reasons why we are doomed. In reverse order:

2. We didn't use any stupid effects.

One of the judging criteria is actually how well you use iMovie's special effects features, which are, by the way, awful. Last year's winner from Emory was a "parody" of The Ring (in quotes because it wasn't at all "funny") that extensively used iMovie's revolutionary ability to speed up motion. Second place was a movie so boring that I only saw the first 45 seconds, but in that amount of time they managed to work in sepia tone.

And our movie? Well, we played around with lighting a little, but nothing anyone would notice. (There is that school of thought that editing shouldn't draw attention to itself.) In other words, as people who have made movies before, we edited it well instead of using all of iMovie's bells and whistles, and for that we will surely suffer.

1. Corporate sponsorship.

Each year, this contest has a new "theme." Submitted films are asked to conform to the theme, no matter how loosely. Our team, hilariously, was told the wrong theme. Even when we found out the right one, though, we had no idea how to work it in. The theme is "Good comes around." We had already decided on the cat thing, in which there is no good, either coming or going. We decided to ignore the theme.

Come to find out that Delta, the festival's major sponsor, has a new slogan, "Good goes around," which, well, I have no idea what it means. But that's beyond the point -- this can't possibly be a coincidence. In other words, we should have done a movie about the convenience and affordability of air travel -- or at least something that a company can use to show off what great things it's funding. Robert, you were right about one thing: my Hitler & Stalin! idea would not have worked out. But the cat idea is definitely no better.

In short, tomorrow's winner will:
* be effects-heavy, with sped-up motion, over-use of the "gong" sound effect, and star wipe.
* be entirely toothless.
* suck.
* not be our movie.

Andrew - 8:07 AM
Comments

Wait. . . we could have had star wipes? They're the filet mignon of wipes.

kk - Feb 16, 2005 - 9:36 AM

If we had done Hitler & Stalin!

A star wipe was even asked for in the screenplay.

Andrew F - Feb 16, 2005 - 9:50 AM

If I knew Delta was the sponsor, I could have done a film (loosely based on the Capital One commercials with David Spade) about the impossibility of redeeming frequent flyer miles. the gong sound effect would totally work for that.

LiAps - Feb 16, 2005 - 9:53 AM

Also, you're not going to win because you didn't parody something like the OC or the Real World.
Loved your movie though.

Lee - Feb 17, 2005 - 12:23 AM

Sadly (and surprisingly) iMovie is now in it's 5th major version without a star wipe.

They are probably worried about cannibalizing sales of Final Cut Express.

Also, the winner is certain to use the "Ken Burns Effect" I seriously considered making a droning multi-part film about my stuffed animal collection, but I doubt PBS/AAPL jokes would wow the crowd.

RM - Feb 17, 2005 - 12:36 AM

While I agree that Hitler and Stalin probably wouldn't have worked for a theme of "good comes around" (or goes around, for that matter), cats like yours and mine are definitely good and go around the house a lot. Themes are twinky anyway and Delta is more likely going down than around. Mom

Mom - Feb 17, 2005 - 2:12 PM

I can't see the damn movie at home or at work. Why do you hate me Andrew?

LiAps - Feb 17, 2005 - 2:12 PM