May 16, 2008

Villains!

Here's a rough transcript of a phone call I got around 10am.

AUTOMATED MESSAGE Blah blah blah car warranty blah blah blah expire soon blah blah press one to speak to an operator blah blah blah

Andrew presses one.

OPERATOR Blah blah blah --

ANDREW
Never, ever, ever call this number again, ever.

OPERATOR
...um...your warranty...

ANDREW
Ever.

OPERATOR
Are you sure?

ANDREW
I am absolutely sure. Never call me again.

OPERATOR
Why?

ANDREW
Because you're scam artists. Take me off your list.

OPERATOR
I'm not taking you off the list.

ANDREW
Take me off the list.

OPERATOR
I'm not taking you off the list. (click)

ANDREW
Unbelievable.

And yet it happened. Okay, so I could've been smoother about that. Next time I'm going to identify myself as Colonel Furdell, and inform them that cold-calling a secret military installation is grounds for black-ops firebombing.

Andrew - 10:16 AM [link] [3 comments]

December 14, 2007

Imagine Denholm Elliott in the Indiana Jones movies, but less educated, and that's basically me

A couple of tourists from Chicago made the truly idiotic mistake of asking me for directions today while I was walking downtown. Driving home from work, I realized that, while I didn't technically send them in the exact opposite cardinal direction that they were going for, it still was a far cry from what you would call the "correct" direction. I may have also named cross streets that neither cross, nor perhaps exist.

I'd feel bad, but come on -- they should have known better! My inability to grasp concepts like "north" and "east" should have been clue #1.

Seriously, how did this happen to me? Which part of my brain didn't develop right, so that everyone else has this skill that I've never quite been able to master -- this "knowing where the hell you are" skill, not to mention the "knowing where the hell you're going and how to get there" set.

Andrew - 12:03 AM [link] [3 comments]

February 1, 2007

"I'm doing this as hard as I can"

I don't know why this isn't getting more media coverage -- certainly my station hasn't mentioned it.

Advertisements for the Cartoon Network, involving Mooninites flipping you off, were placed in several major cities. Only in Boston were they assumed to be bombs.

The arrested guys held a press conference in which they refused to answer questions that weren't about hairstyles of the 1960s. (No, really.)

Most insightful quote: 'Assistant Attorney General John Grossman called the light boards "bomb-like" devices and said that if they had been explosive they could have damaged transportation infrastructure in the city.'

These "bomb-like" devices were essentially Lite-Brites with cartoon characters on them. So I guess they were bomb-like in that they, too, were solid matter.

Andrew - 4:51 PM [link] [11 comments]

December 29, 2006

Oh, it's much worse than you think

I'll boil down my travel travails as much as I can to get to the good parts...

As I already mentioned, it was my second leg's half hour lateness that caused me to miss the last flight out of Vegas to Eugene. Around midnight I was given a hotel voucher and told to be back by 5:30am for a morning Delta flight to Eugene via Salt Lake City, so with five hours to kill, naturally I went to Mandalay and played some poker.

Five hours later and $115 richer (assuming you, like me, prefer to count taxi fare as a loss) I returned to the airport. Unfortunately, I was rejected from the Delta flight because of a clerical error -- apparently my ticket number was in the US Airways format and not the Delta format. Standing in about six lines solved this problem -- but then the Delta people told me I was too late for that flight, and they wouldn't be able to get me to Eugene until 7pm or so.

US Airways told me that I could wait that long, or I could hop on a flight to Phoenix, where I would be on standby for a noon flight to Eugene. I expressed concern that, if I didn't make it onto the plane (since they're always overbooked on the holidays anyway), I'd just be stuck in Phoenix for an extra six hours, which would be infinitely worse than being stuck in Vegas with an unused hotel voucher for that long. However I was told that my chances were good. So off to Phoenix I went.

That plan, of course, sucked. I asked for a hotel voucher in Phoenix (because at this point I had been travelling for around 20 hours and needed a nap), but was turned down. I had to sleep on hard chairs in the sunlight while little kids squealed all around me. It was 100% lame.

Possible ideas:

  • Pneumatic tubes. You know, like at the bank, but with people. I think that's how they travelled from city to city in Starship Troopers.

  • I have a theory that we can bend spacetime by putting something really massive, like a black hole, maybe in the Midwest somewhere. That would bring the two coasts a lot closer together, but maybe only for a few nanoseconds before we all die.

  • Teleportation, specifically as seen in The Fly. As in the Southpark episode in which Mr. Garrison invents a new mode of travel that operates by penetrating your mouth and rectum: "Well, it beats dealing with airline companies."

Andrew - 1:48 AM [link] [2 comments]

November 18, 2006

If you're going to steal jokes, at least be funny

The Sports Guy's mailbag once again mirrors everything I'm thinking.

Q: I'm 99 percent positive that Randolph and Mortimer Duke recently wagered $1 that they could turn the funniest, most successful stand-up comic into a disturbed bum on the street and turn a random unfunny guy off the street into the hottest comic in the land with TV specials and a feature film. How else can you explain the fall of Dave Chappelle and the rise of Dane Cook? It is the only answer. Looking good Dane Cook! Feeling good Dave Chappelle!
--DeVito, Washington

SG: There's still a month left in 2006, but that's the E-Mail of the Year so far.

Dane is completely not funny, but very popular with the kids. Who just haven't heard enough jokes yet.

James - 11:56 AM [link] [2 comments]

September 21, 2006

Bank of America: Evil?

Julia and I each just received new credit cards in the mail from Bank of America, to replace the old ones. Problem: we never had old ones, even though their convincing letter claims we've been cardholders since 2003.

I called BofA to get an explanation, which was, of course, not forthcoming. In the end they decided that what I had received was probably a fraud -- but I'm not buying it. If it's a fraud, it's the most sophistocated and well-financed fraud of all time. In other words, I think BofA was trying to scam me into activating credit cards that have annual fees by hoping I was too addle-minded to realize I don't already have an account with them. Bastards.

Have they been doing this to anyone else, or is it just us?

Andrew - 1:43 PM [link] [6 comments]

February 14, 2006

My theory on why Cheney shot his friend

From what I've read, Cheney's 78-year-old hunting partner was an old pal and a hefty contributor to the Dark Side. So no, I don't think this is all part of some awesome conspiracy to shoot him on purpose out of hate.

Here's how I think it went down...

Cheney sees some quail off to his left. He turns, shotgun raised. These flightless birds are going down.

The birds are moving farther to the left. Cheney turns a little more and his finger starts its gentle squeeze on the trigger. Suddenly, Cheney notices his pal in the extremely bright orange vest, standing in between him and some birds. Some birds that Cheney has vowed must die.

So I figure, in this split second, our VP had to weigh his options. "Yes, I'll injure and perhaps even kill an old man and staunch supporter. But if I don't fire, those birds won't taste sweet death. What to do?" And naturally, being as he is completely evil, he fired.

Andrew - 5:21 AM [link] [1 comment]

June 9, 2005

An Open Letter to the Cell Phone People

Dearest Cell Phone People,

It's bad enough that I have to sit through my friends and relatives telling me oh so insightfully to leave a message after the tone. But then I get this voice, this Gladys Stevens of Omaha Nebraska voice, telling me that I can stay on the freakin' line and wait like an idiot if I want to leave a message. You fools. My dumbass friend or relative just told me to leave a message after the beep. I get that. What does it even mean to leave a "call back number"? Doesn't everyone's cell phone tell them who called anyway?

I hate you hate you hate you. I suspect you had a hand in the 2wenty. And possibly other atrocities throughout history that will go unnamed. I have calculated that at least 2 hours of my life have been wasted listening to your inane female robot voice prattle on about my message-leaving options. That's two hours I could have spent watching Conan the Barbarian, which is an excellent movie with a really good soundtrack. I'm playing the score in my head right now.

Take that, cell phone people.

Yours in anger,
Andrew Furdell

Andrew - 11:28 PM [link]

March 9, 2005

The candies, guv! Don't eat the candies!

From the Philippines, a tragic case of food poisoning, and a tragicker case of stupidity.

Nearly 30 elementary school children in the Philippines have died after eating fried cassava balls obtained from a vendor, a local official told CNN.

[...]

The vendor who sold the cassava balls insisted nothing was wrong with them and ate a few to prove the point. Now she, too, is in critical condition.

That really shouldn't be funny. But somehow, it is.

James - 12:53 PM [link] [3 comments]

January 29, 2005

The MGM DVD thing, and why everyone is stupid

Maybe you've heard that a long list of MGM DVDs, supposedly widescreen, are actually chop jobs -- pan 'n' scan transfers cut down to look like real widescreen. It's a good thing I'm here to tell you that's totally stupid.

Pan and scan, for those of you who don't know, is a method of adapting widescreen movies for standard-size TVs. You can't see the whole image at once, so if the important stuff is going on at the left side, we just paaaan over to the left. It's an awful way to watch movies -- I have an old pan and scan Alien VHS that illustrates nicely how awful it is.

So consider this: if your copy of The Princess Bride was really a chop job,

  • It wouldn't look nearly as pretty;

  • Andre the Giant's head would be cut out of most shots;

  • thousands of people would have noticed three years ago; and

  • the director's commentary would have been a bit more hostile.

Oh yeah, and: why the hell would MGM go to the trouble of making fake widescreen, when it has real widescreen prints? Duh.

So what's really going on? It turns out the complaint has more to do with the packaging than the DVD transfer.

It seems the packaging on those DVDs claim that widescreen format provides up to 50% more image than standard-format. But some movies are originally shot in a less wide aspect ratio than they intend to be shown theatrically. In other words, sometimes standard format actually shows you more than widescreen -- but it's stuff you weren't supposed to see. Standard format versions of those movies tend to have a lot of boom mikes at the top of the screen.

So in other words, completely frivolous. And no, you don't have to send your DVDs back. So, why do I think everyone is stupid?

Because the things I mentioned should be totally obvious. A widescreen made from a pan and scan would have, what, maybe 40% of the original image? On a close-up you'd just see someone's nose! Come on people! Use your noggins.

Andrew - 9:24 PM [link]

January 18, 2005

Freedom takes another victim

Snopes says it's true, so I guess it must be. Derek Kieper, a 21-year-old senior from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, wrote an editorial for the Daily Nebraskan pointing out that, by gum, brave men died for our right to drive a ton of metal at great speeds without taking the proper safety precautions, and he, for one, was not going to let an oppressive, totalitarian government such as ours tell him to wear a seatbelt.

So, when his friend's Ford Explorer slipped on an icy interstate and rolled into a ditch, what do you think was going through young Derek's mind? That's right: the windshield. Ouch.

Andrew - 6:28 PM [link] [1 comment]

December 4, 2004

Ignorance is bliss

Either I just missed coverage of this referendum, or it took a back seat to all the coverage of the anti-gay marriage referenda, but today's Washington Post reports: "Vote to Keep Segregation in Ala. Charter Is Verified." (Registration required, I think.) It comes as no surprise to me that people in Alabama are bigoted, but I am still dumbfounded by this. The margin of victory on the measure was less than two-tenths of a percent, but that still means that half of voting Alabamans voted to keep language in their state constitution that requires segregated schools and poll taxes.

Supposedly the reason so many people voted against the measure is because it "also would have removed language that said there is no constitutional right to an education at public expense in Alabama." That sure does explain a lot about the quality of education in Alabama. It is stunning to me that in this era of "No Child Left Behind" rhetoric there are children who have no constitutional right to an education. And that people are willing to vote for blatantly racist policies in order to protect this state of affairs.

These two things may actually go hand in hand. Nothing fuels racism like ignorance, and about 650,000 Alabamans have just voted to hold fast to both.

Kimberly - 11:12 AM [link]

November 27, 2004

Well played, nascarfan82088

You landed that $125 Wal-Mart gift card you saw on eBay.

And your winning bid was only $127.51.

I salute you.

(Side note: I have now blogged from four countries, thus earning my nerd merit badge.)

James - 10:18 AM [link]

November 19, 2004

We're providing a public service here, people

furdell.com: Helping LiveJournalers cheat on their English papers since 2004!

James - 2:33 PM [link]

November 17, 2004

Are you ready for some BOOBIES?!

Oh, the drama.

An ABC-TV cross-promotion on "Monday Night Football" for the new series "Desperate Housewives" worked a little too well, so the network apologized all over itself yesterday.

ABC's intro to Eagles-Cowboys featured a naked Nicollette Sheridan, one of the "Housewives," jumping into the arms of Philly receiver Terrell Owens. Viewers and the NFL then jumped all over the network.

"We have heard from many of our viewers about the 'MNF' opening segment and we agree that the placement was inappropriate," ABC said in a statement.

The NFL called the intro "inappropriate and unsuitable for our 'Monday Night Football' audience."

Here we go again, with the complaints about nudity/sexual suggestiveness adjacent to football coverage. "Oh nooo, think of the children! They will be scarred for LIFE after seeing Nicolette Sheridan's NAKED BACK!" or something. (And don't forget the underexplored "white woman jumping into the arms of a black man" factor, which, in our backward-thinking nation, surely caused at least a portion of the complaints.)

This whole situation astounds me, considering the context: the three-hour orgy of violence known as Monday Night Football. Don't get me wrong, I love football. I even officiate at the high school level. But let's face it: it's an extremely violent sport. When we work games, we concentrate on safety issues in an effort to prevent players from incurring serious injuries. It's an uphill battle, because football fans tend glorify the big hits and revel in the roughness.

MNF has been the scene of some gruesome sights. The one I remember like a recurring nightmare was Napoleon McCallum's horrific knee injury during the first Monday night game of the season in 1994. I even remember where I was when I saw this -- in my freshman dorm room, watching with hallmates, who were similarly disturbed.

With the Raiders playing the San Francisco 49ers at Candlestick Park on Monday Night Football, McCallum took a handoff and ...

"I got the ball and just tried to run through the middle, and the whole line was stopped up," McCallum recalls. "There was a big pile and I tried to go forward, and (49ers linebacker) Ken Norton had my shoulders and he was trying to pull me back. I'm pushing forward, and he's pulling me back and something gave, and that was my knee."

It was a gruesome sight, and a worldwide audience witnessed it over and over on instant replay: McCallum's left knee had been contorted so badly that his lower leg looked to be dangling by a thread. Blood was quite visible.

EWWWW. It's 10 years later and I can't even think about that scene without getting a little queasy. And, of course, the producers kept showing the replay over and over and over... and I kept yelling, "Stop, stop, STOP! I no longer want to see that man's foot touching his own stomach!" (I'm just grateful McCallum's still able to walk, because it really looked like he was going to lose a leg.)

Even more famous is the hit Lawrence Taylor put on Joe Theismann in 1985, breaking Theismann's leg in two places, sending him to the hospital and ending his career. And, again, ABC kept replaying it and replaying it until the nation collectively vomited.

Now, you can argue that violence isn't the main reason we love football, and that everyone involved is properly shocked and somber when a player is injured. But then I would have to point you to this website, where you can buy an autographed photo of Lawrence Taylor, taken right as he's about to break Theisman's leg into three pieces. We, quite simply, glorify the violence.

And, we're willing to let our kids watch players' legs get separated from their bodies, but if the network shows a topless woman from the back... NOW the children watching are scarred for life? There's nothing harmful about boobies, people. Boobies never broke anyone's leg in two. Boobies never bent anyone's knee 45 degrees in the wrong direction. (Well, not that I'm aware of.)

Yes, I realize I live in a country where gay marriage is a hotter social issue than the thousands of people who have died in Iraq, and that this is just symptomatic of that same bizarre mode of thinking. We, as a nation, fear sex and love violence. And I just don't get it. Why isn't it the other way around? It should be the other way around.

(Desperate Housewives, by the way: great show. Highly recommended. We watch it every week with our lawyer friend "Staci".)

James - 12:36 PM [link] [16 comments]

November 2, 2004

Gimme Pi-K-A one time!!!

Looks like our old favorite frat from Emory is in for some possible double-secret expulsion.

Pike President Lee Brodsky said the fraternity is being reviewed because of ?a frequency of incidents? involving underage drinking and violence.

Not Pi Kappa Alpha! I am shocked. They were always so committed to community service. (And, by "community service", I mean, you know, date rape and so on.)

James - 3:16 PM [link]

October 26, 2004

My office the honeypot

Hey, here's a funny story from work.

I'm working on this project that lives on its own dedicated Linux server. It's a state-of-the-art setup; essentially, eight different computers, or "nodes", are hooked together to create one big number-crunching behemoth. The server has a gigabit Ethernet connection, so it's very fast. Our project lives on the server and uses its processing power to calculate underwater microphone data, in order to localize noise sources on sumarines.

But in the past week, I'd been having some big connectivity problems; I would connect to the big machine from my desk, only to have the connection inexplicably dropped every 10-15 minutes when I would try to do something. After a few days of this I got fed up and went to the company's network administrator to let him know about the problem. He pulled up the firewall data and found the problem: the server had been transmitting data to the outside Internet(s). Lots of data. Continuously. In fact, about a gigabyte's worth in about a day. There was so much traffic that it was even choking off my office connection. Ruh-oh! There was no reason for that to be happening; none of our work was Internet(s)-intensive. What was going on?

All of a sudden I'm Nancy Drew, and there's trouble down by Mystery Lake!

After some detective work, my fears were confirmed: it had been hacked. Somebody out there on the Internets had been repeatedly trying to break in all month by trying different common usernames and passwords, and had hit on a successful combination. Then, using the account access, they apparently began using the big server to launch denial of service attacks against various unknown targets.

The thing is, this is not an uncommon security problem, nor is it one that's difficult to guard against. If you make sure that everyone has a difficult-to-crack password, and keep the operating system well updated with all the latest security fixes, attacks like these are easy to fend off. Otherwise, people can gain access to your machine, and use that access to gain access to the super-powerful "root" account, which basically gives them run of the entire system.

So, if you're like my company, and you set the super-powerful "root" account's password to... wait for it... "Password" (ugh), and then put that server out on the Internets, you're pretty much asking for trouble. And we were hax0red. Big time.

It's hard to tell where the attackers are from, since captured machines from around the world can be used to do their dirty work. For all we know it was a bunch of Latvians trying to pull a shake-down, or perhaps Matthew Broderick (although, thankfully, my "Global Thermonuclear War" project appeared untouched). At any rate, we had to unplug the big server and will have to re-install the operating system to remove the offending installed programs.

The moral of the story: don't set your password to "Password." That's moronic.

James - 11:18 PM [link] [8 comments]

June 24, 2004

You've got jail

Jason Smathers, a 24-year-old software engineer working for America On-Line, was arrested earlier today for selling 92 million AOL e-mail addresses to a 21-year-old Las Vegas man, Sean Dunaway. Dunaway, who was also arrested, spammed the addresses with e-mails for penis enlargement pills.

Sadly for Mr. Smathers, late of Harpers Ferry, W. Va., he operates a web page bearing his name, much like we do. And on that page is a discussion forum that is open to everyone. Which is now filling up with angry messages, such as this one:

Dear Jason,

We hate you and hope you die.

Have a rat sandwich. Signed,
the internet.

That crazy Internet, always holding a grudge. Anyway, check out Smathers' site before it goes away.

James - 12:37 AM [link] [2 comments]

June 23, 2004

The dark side of the Internet

Sometimes the internal monologues of people you come across on the Internet can get skin-crawlingly repulsive. My co-worker Andy brought today's example to my attention: pro-anorexia online communities.

As the name implies, pro-anorexia (or "pro-ana") people are anorexics who feel that starving themselves into double-digit weights is not so much a "disease" as a "lifestyle choice."

A scary, frightening lifestyle choice.

The pro-anas gather in groups to support each other in fasting, exercising too much, and obsessing over their body images, rather than encouraging each other to, you know, maintain a healthy body weight, nutrional diet, and non-insane exercise program. It's all one big, happy family of enablers.

Here are some choice examples of pro-ana dialogue:

Ok girls i am having some major difficulties here. you all probably know how i feel right now. I'm like sobbing...it's so frustrating. Now to refresh, i've been ana for like 7 years, but for the past few months i've binged like crazy out of depression. a couple weeks ago i started a restrictive diet...and i HAVEN'T LOST ANY WEIGHT.

like for instance, today i had:

2 pickles - 0 cals
1 small bag popcorn - 100 cals

100 cals, right?

And i've started taking hydroxycut today.

but...i'm STILL AT THE SAME WEIGHT. I mean i've tried EVERYTHING. I really need some help. It's making me so frustrated i don't know what to do.

- tear_ducts

More:

So, I lost about 15 pounds...good right? wrong. I was looking in the mirror and I noticed stretch marks. Probably from going up and down on my weight..does anyone eles have this problem? Is there some creams to make them go away? Im fasting for 3 days so if anyone wants to be fasting buddies let me know.

-sexii_darling
I'm still at 115.

I've been eating quite a bit lately.. or, at least, the past two days. I'm not even gonna try to list how much I've eaten.

But, some nice esteem-boosting happened last night... my friends and I had to break into my friend's car because he locked his keys in. After thinking for about 30 minutes and trying various different things, the guys decided they would pull the top of the door back to try to get something in there to unlock it. They decided my arm would be the best choice. "Who needs a wire hanger when you have Sarah?" That made me feel a bit better... as did being hit on at the bar about an hour later, but that's a whoooole 'nother story.

-painful blue
hey girls, I haven't written in such a long time... i miss you all! i just got back from visiting my gramma, who reads tabloids. She has last week's Star issue (i think it was last week's) with Mary-Kate Olsen's bony back on the cover. she told me if i kept not eating, my back would look like hers. i told her, good. she made me go to the bathroom and show her my back so she could compare the two and i was hoping for her to say, "oh my god, it looks the same!" but unfortunately she said, "well you're not there yet but you will be if you keep starving yourself." so that's what i'll keep doing. since i've gotten back she keeps calling with diets (she's a nutritionist) which is cool, but they're all like 1100 calories a day, which is a lot for me. she says that girls our age shouldn't go more than 2-4 weeks on less than that or we'll be "about six weeks from death" but i just want to be thinner! ergh.. oh well. of course, i say all that and then i go and eat M&Ms, a Dean & DeLuca chocolate bar, AND a grilled cheese sandwich - ALL IN ONE DAY. Plus a bowl of cereal. well, like they say, tomorrow's a new day

- dirtysymbolic

Yick. And those are just from the Livejournal pro-ana community. There are other discussion boards and the like out there:

i feel that in a perfect world, exercise and dieting in moderation would be the best way to shrink HOWEVER we are not in that perfect world so....for me......simply--no food. common sense. no food goes in. i remember after a really long fast (needed to look good for a wedding) - i stood brushing my teeth and really looked at myself in the mirror and i kid you not, it was the best feeling in this galaxy. nothing is worse than being FAT. nothing. here is a weird question, but i have friends/coworkers that are huge and they never seem to care that they are huge. i mean, they outwardly seem happy. what is that all about???? does anyone notice this or am i nuts? i see a lot of fat people and they appear happy and in bliss...in the supermarket....in the mall etc...it is like they find looking horrible acceptable and they are at peace with themselves. how can that be???.....just a thought.....
peace to all,
~C~

This brings us to The Most Disturbing Thing I've Read on the Internet. And I've read some disturbing, repugnant things on the Internet. But this may take the cake (no pun intended). This lady will surely haunt my nightmares forever. (This Livejournal post has since taken down but is mirrored here.)

This may sound weird. I just need some feedback/ advise?

ok so i work in a daycare (as some of you know) .... For children aged from birth to 5 years. The children bring their own food from home and it is my job to make sure they eat it, are able to eat it (may need to be fed if they are babies) and are able to open their food/ containers whatever? We also feed the babies their bottles of formula. I got given the job of lunch/ snack times because I show such an avid interest in it. I love getting the lunches out and setting them down on the table.. feeding the children and watching them eat. I also love controlling them.. this sounds sick but. I water the babies milk bottles down so the calories are cut, if a child has the choice of a fruit bun or carrot sticks I make them eat the carrot sticks. I give them water not juice. And if the child has any junkfood of any sort I take it away from them. When it comes to babies food the mums usually give a choice.. if there is say, custard or veges, I give them vegies. what the hell. Am I just so frigan weird? I'm like obsessed over meal times at the daycare. Im psyco. I take the crust off their sanwiches, and if im feeding the babies I never allow them to finish an entire bottle or dish of food. Even if they scream. If a kid tells me "I'm hungry" I ignore them and get them outside and do running games / exercise.

Is this child abuse? I really become another weird person at daycare mealtimes. ps- i never eat at work. ever.

is this another control game?

The writer was, appropriately, eviscerated by those who replied. But still, this is so very scary if it's true. It really gives you a sense of how truly insane people are.

So, thanks, Internet! Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go sit in the dark, curl up in the fetal position, and eat some cookies.

James - 5:04 PM [link] [4 comments]

June 9, 2004

Why you should not shop at Best Buy

So I get home yesterday, and I sit down to watch some TV. Those of you who have come to my home and mooched off of my hospitality already know that my set is a widescreen projection TV. No, I'm not bragging; these details are actually relevant to the story.

So I turn on the TV, and lo and behold, there is a spider on the screen. A minor annoyance, to be sure! With courage in my heart, I arose from the couch to vanquish my eight-legged foe. I tried to shoo him off the screen, but it didn't take. That was when I realized: the spider was inside the television. Eeeeek!!

I tried tapping the screen. That made her move her legs a little, but all in all she wasn't too perturbed. (Yes, this was clearly a girl spider. Like Charlotte.) Realizing that my movie-watching enjoyment would be lessened by the ever-present spider, I did something completely futile: I called the lying dipshits at Best Buy, who I am not at all Google-bombing.

How are they lying dipshits, you ask? To answer this question, we must travel back in time to November 2002, when I purchased the set from an Atlanta Best Buy. I also bought a 4-year, $300 protection plan, even though my brother told me I would be stupid to do so. Hey, look, the sales representative was very convincing, okay?

HER Oh yeah, it covers everything. It covers everything short of, like, if you get pissed off at a game and throw a football through the screen or something.

ME
What if I get up too fast, and trip, and fall right through the screen? Does it cover that?

HER
Sure. And you?ll need this plan, because about twice a year you?ll need to get the bulbs rotated, or else all the colors get mixed up.

Look, I?m willing to admit when I?m stupid, and I admit: I was stupid. I should have realized something was up, because another sales rep told me the television would only work with satellite TV (which required more hardware and a service subscription), even though common sense told me that nobody would manufacture a television that isn?t compatible with cable. I knew he was lying, at least. I also might have benefited from a more close read of the protection plan, which plainly states that it does not cover intentional or accidental damage, and then proceeds to list a whole lot of other things it doesn?t cover, including ? natch ? insect infestation, which I promise I?ll get back to shortly. The point is, I wasn?t jaded enough yet to realize that total strangers were lying to my face.

Fast forward six months. My roommate insists on using the set?s 4:3 aspect ratio mode to watch regular TV. Neither of us realizes that excessive use of this feature will lead to image burn. Sure enough, the left and right sides of the screen are oddly more yellow than the middle part. Assuming ? and I want to point out that I?m really putting myself out there by posting this, and I don?t need you to make fun of me when I?m in such an emotionally vulnerable position ? assuming that the bulbs needed to be rotated (oh god), I called the Best Buy people. This is when I was informed that the protection plan really only covers, and I quote, ?lightning strike.? I didn?t ask if it also covers lottery-winning.

Understand, gentle reader, that this television was an extravagant purchase, by which I mean ?more than I should have spent, on anything.? So when I looked at that screen with its yellowing sides and realized how much I had spent to watch movies that way, tears welled up in my eyes. Tears?of righteous rage.

It took about three days of phone-calling, ?I want to speak to your supervisor?ing, and all the whining you would expect from a person like me, before I finally got on the phone with someone in a position to make actual decisions. It was the guy who ultimately decides whether a customer gets a replacement unit or not.

What I loved about this guy was that he had emotional depth. None of Best Buy?s other phone people seemed to care about me or my situation, but this guy seemed genuinely depressed. I imagined him, sitting in his office at a distribution center somewhere in the boonies, and in my imagination he looked like a human, live-action Droopy Dog. I told him the whole story.

DROOPY Yeah, you know, sometimes they tell customers that the plan does cover when you throw a football through the screen. You got off easy.

ME
People who represent your company deceived me, and you?re telling me it?s routine? That?s awful.

DROOPY
Yup. It?s pretty bad.

Seriously, I was almost ready to give him a refund. If the TV hadn?t been so damned expensive I might have let it go, but instead, when he was at his weakest, I did the unthinkable: I dropped the ?you don?t want to lose a valued customer? bomb. I hated myself even as I did it, but my replacement set was on the way. And that was the end of that aside.

So getting back to my more recent problem, which you may or may not remember was a spider behind the screen. I called the lying dipshits, and was promptly reminded that my protection plan does not cover insect infestation.

ME Actually, technically spiders are arachnids.

DOUCHEBAG
Look, I can send someone out there, but it isn?t covered in your warranty, so you?ll have to pay for it. It?s $90 for them to come out and assess the problem, plus they?ll bill you for the time they spend there.

ME
Can I save money by assessing the problem myself? There?s a spider in there. Problem found.

DOUCHEBAG
I?m afraid it doesn?t work that way, sir.

ME
Fine, then can you tell me how to open up the set myself?

DOUCHEBAG
That may void your warranty, sir.

ME
Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! But seriously ? how to I open the set?

DOUCHEBAG
I?m not trained to tell you myself, but I can put you through to someone who is. Of course, since this isn?t covered by your warranty, you will be charged for the call.

ME
Click! ::followed by the actual click of me hanging up the phone::

Long story short: I figured out on my own how to open up the set, and discovered that inside is a magical world of lights, wires, a big-ass mirror, and spider webs; I dispatched of the spider and scooped out about a handful of webbing, which was gross; and I charged myself $90. Then, I renewed my vow to tell the world to never shop at Best Buy.

If you absolutely must buy something from Best Buy, remember always the three rules.

  1. Never believe a word the sales representatives say. They are, in ways you can not imagine, lying dipshits. In fact, if one of them tries to talk to you, kick him or her in the shin and spit in his or her eye.
  2. For the love of God, do not buy the protection plan. It protects nothing and is a total scam. Best Buy is not your friend.
  3. No matter how much they beg, whatever you do, never ever feed a Best Buy employee after midnight. I can?t stress that one enough.
Andrew - 1:18 PM [link] [6 comments]

April 21, 2004

The 90s: A Decade with No Redeeming Value

I'm glad my brother brought up the subject of completely retarded lists made up by cable entertainment channels, because I've been meaning to broach the subject of E!'s 101 Reasons the 90s Ruled.

Those of you who remembered the 90s probably remember that, right up until about '99, it sucked hardcore. Rock music pretty much died for good, with grunge as its death rattle; everybody rushed out to see Best Pictures Titanic and Forrest Gump and motherfucking Saving Private Ryan; and speculators bought stacks of comic books, without particular regard for their quality, paving the way for the Spider-Man Clone Saga -- the absolute most boring and convoluted storyline in all of Spidey's history, and believe me, I'm in a position to know.

The long and the short of it is, we all hated the 90s -- except my bastard roommate Matt. For some reason Matt insists that the 90s were awesome. Matt is clearly mistaken, as can be easily demonstrated by a sample of reasons E! believed the 90s to have ruled.

  • The Spice Girls. Ruled. Apparently. (They were #18)

  • Number one reason the 90s ruled: Seinfeld. That's right. The best thing about that decade was a sitcom that we're all extremely tired of.

  • My favorite reason the 90s ruled: 'We didn't have Paris Hilton.' I'm not even making this up, it was on the list at #9. You can only pretend the 90s ruled by pointing out the awful things about other decades that it lacks. Like, 'less terrorist-collapsed buildings.' Well, slightly less.

Look, I can't convey how ridiculous the idea of 90s nostalgia is on my own. Just take a look at the full list, and hope beyond hope that people never REALLY get nostalgic for the 90s.

Andrew - 3:54 PM [link] [4 comments]

April 15, 2004

Bored? Try Online Petitions

Apparently, the first Google result for the word "jew" is a poorly-designed (aren't they all) antisemitic site called Jew Watch. According to Snopes, Jew Watch has topped the list since 2001, but this hilariously misguided online petition is relatively new.

Somehow, the petitioner got it in his head that if he collected 50,000 names online, Google would remove Jew Watch from its results page. This, in spite of the fact that Google never manually adjusts search results, since doing so would damage the search engine's integrity; and more fundamentally in spite of the fact that online petitions never ever amount to anything.

Now, personally, I'm pretty sure impressionable children aren't rushing to their web browsers, typing in "jew," and clicking "I'm feeling lucky." Even if they did, Jew Watch is an incomprehensible jumble of links in teensy font. I stared at it for several minutes and, though I do seem to be filled with slightly more hate, I don't feel like I'm directing it at any group in particular.

Proving that not everybody who believes in this cause is fundamentally retarded, some folk have been googlebombing a much-more-helpful definition of Jew to the top of the list. It's a shaky battle, with Jew Watch currently on top, but who knows. Personally I'm much more perturbed by the content of MartinLutherKing.org, which I discovered through Jew Watch. The site design is dangerously legible, and its innocent-looking presentation and domain name are really creepy.

What's the bright side of all this? Well, with more than 80,000 signers, there's plenty of hilarious messages on the petition website! This is going to be even more fun than that "Rename 'The Two Towers' To Something Less Offensive" petition from a couple of years ago. Follow me on a journey to Stupid.

Here's a sampling, sorted into categories. With around 90000 signatures, there's plenty for you to read when you get bored. I recommend!

I believe in free speech, but...
"The site is reprehensible,obscene and although I uphold the freedom of speech and religion, I find the support of such hatred unconscionable"
"The First Amendment is a fine idea, but Google, you have a responsibility as the #1 search engine to be a bit more selective about what comes up."
"Freedom of speech is different from promotion of HATE. Google it is time to wake up."
"I don't think that it is always a good idea to deny freedom of speech, but I'll make an exception in this case. Though I think that they are addressing the converted, one needs to rebut the misinformation if it is not removed."

Google does webhosting now, right?
"please remove this .com address"
"I would like Google to refuse to host anti-Semitic websites and any other sites that target and defame groups of people."

Weird threats
"This site is ignorant, shameful & disgusting...My wish for the person who started this site is this...I hope that your only offspring marries a Jew!!"
"either remove this vile site or we remove Google forever"
"having this on Google is outragous...if you don't remove it, we'll use Yahoo" (Ha! Yeah, RIGHT.)

When all else fails, use a clich?
"It is outrageous in this day and age for Google to ignore this form of hatred and racism!"
"Anti-semitism ain't just a river in Egypt" (that one's actually pretty funny.)
"Search Engines should not promote HATE." (I find that one hilarious too, but I'm not sure why.)
"It is the year 2004 already! You would think we would have evolved past these things !"
"Arent there enough problems in this world?"
"its a sad day in our life when a computer company can help spread hate. a very sad day.........."

Andrew - 6:07 PM [link] [7 comments]